North Korea Accuses Takeshima Labeling
2021-07-17
Category:Takeshima problem
I'm participating in the ranking.Please click and cheer for me.
North Korea's Olympic Committee criticized Shimane Prefecture's Takeshima labeling on its website and demanded that the organizing committee delete it from the map.The statement criticized the Takeshima as an unforgivable provocation that trampled on the autonomy of our nation by making fun of the wishes of athletes and mankind around the world for peace.He also pointed out to the International Olympic Committee (IOC), "We have no choice but to hold the organizing committee responsible for acquiescing in and encouraging it."
It was your country that was criticized by international organizations, right?
Source article:毎日新聞
I'm participating in the ranking.Please click and cheer for me.
[related article]
The Continent doesn't know the sea.Japan was familiar with the sea. They don't know anything about Sea of Japan or the Senkaku Islands.
In Korea, the Japanese are often referred to as "Japanese pirates" and "Japanese pirates" based in Sea of Japan, which were attacked by ships on the Korean Peninsula and Chinese ships, and are used differently in the sense that the Japanese are barbaric and violent.So why are Japanese pirates still being handed down?That's because it's too strong.
Japanese pirates are a group that knows the sea well.Japan is an island country and a maritime country, which is the most different from mainland countries.Since ancient times, Japan has been familiar with the sea through fishing using ingredients obtained from the sea.Currents, weather, climate, wind, humidity, etc.Continental countries look to the mainland.The enemy is located in the continent, and in China and South Korea, the main focus is on defending the enemy in the west and north.It is also the enemy of the continent that must be conquered.
Since it is not easy to cross the sea and invade, the sea is the area that protects our country, and China and the Korean Peninsula do not know the sea as a result of little effort in history.Without knowing what islands and oceans lie to the east of the continent, it is impossible to give more historical facts about Jukdo's understanding and Senkaku's understanding than Japan's.
The reason why the Sea of Japan army was so strong is its historical characteristics as a geopolitical maritime state.This is why the Baltic fleet sank and why the Wonhui disappeared to the bottom of the sea.Even if they appeal to the international community to call Sea of Japan East Sea, what on earth do they know about Sea of Japan?Even the location of Jukdo cannot be identified in historical literature on the Korean Peninsula.
Korea hardly knew the island in Sea of Japan.China called Taiwan an out-of-the-culture land and had little interest in Taiwan historically.
MacArthur Line and Takeshima - South Korea does not know that it is a temporary fishing boundary line and not a national border.
Korean reporter who doesn't know the meaning of MacArthur line
Fishing boundaries set before international borders
Takeshima territorial claim rejected by Rusk letter
Syngman Rhee line established just before the treaty took effect
South Korean reasoning that makes no sense at all
A Korea Ilbo article (posted at the bottom) states that the fact that Takeshima is on the Korean side in the nautical chart showing the areas where Japan was allowed to operate fishing boats after the end of the war is evidence that Japan recognized Takeshima as Korean territory. there were.
The map shown by the Japanese side refers to the area in which Japanese fishing vessels can operate as determined by the "Memorandum on Areas Permitted for Japan's Fishing and Whaling Industry," but it merely shows the so-called MacArthur Line. be.
After the end of the war, South Korea was no longer under Japanese rule, and GHQ is conducting various investigations into the border between Japan and South Korea. This line is only a provisional fishing boundary drawn before the official territorial waters are.
During the Japanese colonial period, the Korean peninsula was part of Japan, so fishermen from the Korean peninsula could come to mainland Japan to catch fish, and fishermen from the Japanese mainland also faced problems if they fished near the peninsula. There isn't. That wouldn't be the case in another country.
When considering South Korea's repeated requests to participate in the San Francisco Peace Conference and proposed amendments to the treaty, the South Korean government's claim to Takeshima was clearly denied by the Rusk letter. Even in the peace treaty, Takeshima and Dokdo were not mentioned as areas to be renounced by Japan.
South Korea, which was dissatisfied with this, unilaterally drew up the Syngman Rhee Line just before the official border line was established with the entry into force of the San Francisco Peace Treaty and the MacArthur Line disappeared. be. The San Francisco Peace Conference was held on September 8, 1951, the peace treaty was issued the following year on April 28, 1952, and the Syngman Rhee Line was established on January 18, 1952.
This claimed that the MacArthur Line, which was merely an area where fishing boats were allowed to operate, was their own territory, and also ignored the San Francisco Peace Treaty.
U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Dean Rusk has rejected participation in the peace conference and other territorial claims, including Takeshima.
Japan simply and accurately describes the area where fishing vessels are permitted to operate, but in the same article, Jeong, director of South Korea's Dokdo Research Forum, absurdly asks why they did not use the term Japanese territory. He's making a frivolous rebuttal. Japanese territory and the area where fishing vessels are permitted to operate are not the same, and ultimately Japanese territory and territorial waters will be determined at San Francisco Peace Conference. That is the Japanese area.
It's just that the map doesn't show Japanese territory, so it just doesn't say it's Japanese territory, and it just says that Takeshima is on the South Korean side in the provisional fishing boat operation area.
SCAPIN-1033
5.The present authorization is not an expression of allied policy relative to ultimate determination of national jurisdiction, international boundaries or fishing rights in the area concerned or in any other area.
Conversely, it can be said that the Syngman Rhee line of thinking is one that does not take into account these historical premises or international agreements, and is the current South Korean argument. They confused the provisional area of fishing boat activity with territorial territory, and even now they do not understand that they are completely different concepts.
The South Korean side's argument is that they confuse the MacArthur Line at the time as a national border line, and their thinking has not changed at all from the state in which the Syngman Rhee Line was established.
South Korea failed to participate in the San Francisco Peace Treaty and Peace Conference.a Rusk letter sent to them. Article II of the San Francisco Peace Treaty
(a) Japan acknowledges the independence of Korea and renounces all rights, rights and claims to North Korea, including Jeju Island, Geomun Island and Ulleung Island;
On July 19, 1951, Korean Ambassador to the U.S. visited Darres and handed over a letter to Secretary of State Dean G. Acheson at the instruction of the Korean government. The request for amendment to Article 2(a) shall be amended to "confirm that all rights, rights, and claims were waived on August 9, 1945, before the Japanese annexation of Korea, including Jeju Island, Geomun Island, Ulleungdo, Dokdo, and Parang Island."
"Unfortunately, the U.S. government cannot agree to amendments to the proposal," Rusk said in a letter.The U.S. government does not think the treaty should adopt a theory that Japan's acceptance of the Potsdam Declaration on August 9, 1945 constitutes Japan's formal or final renunciation of sovereignty over the region covered by the declaration.As for the island known as Dokdo or Takeshima or Liancourt Rock, this normally uninhabited Iwashima has never been treated as part of Korea according to our information, and has been under the jurisdiction of the Oki branch of Shimane Prefecture since 1905.I don't think this island was once claimed by Korea."
In response to South Korea's persistent request, the U.S. denied South Korea's Takeshima sovereignty as a final answer.
Article 2(a) of the San Francisco Peace Treaty was officially issued.As you know, 52 countries participated in the San Francisco Peace Conference and agreed on what Japan would or would not give up its sovereignty, and Japan returned to the international community based on the resolution of the postwar compensation issue.By the way, 49 out of 52 countries signed .The three countries that failed to sign the agreement were the Soviet Union, Czechoslovakia, and Poland, which were invalid because China did not participate.
What does the South Korean government mean by international law that claims Takeshima to be Korean territory?
It is clear that Takeshima is Japan in terms of international law and history.Korea's claim is completely unfounded.