|政治|歴史|日韓関係|国際関係|<br>自虐史観から脱却して世界を見る |Politics | History | Japan-South Korea Relations | International Relations |
View the world away from a sense of self-denial history.
皇紀2,684年

Home
Japanese English Korean


The political reform outline of 1989 has become a mere shell - What is Prime Minister Kishida's formulation of

2024-01-22  Category:Japan

I'm participating in the ranking.Please click and cheer for me.
にほんブログ村 政治ブログ 国際政治・外交へ 国際政治・外交ランキング

Political reform outline formulated in 1989

One faction after another announced that they would be disbanded, and Prime Minister Kishida also mentioned the dissolution of the Kochi-kai. Looking at the Political Reform Outline drawn up in 1989, we can see that it does little to address the current party ticket issue. This is an outline adopted by the Liberal Democratic Party in the wake of the Recruit Incident. Prime Minister Kishida has said that he will formulate "new rules," but what is the position of the political reform outline that his own party has drawn up in the past? You can read the full text of the outline by clicking on the link, but here we will describe the table of contents and main points.

Excerpt of the Political Reform Outline
  1. Revising and strengthening the Code of Conduct and the Political Ethics Review Board
  2. Enactment of law to disclose assets of members of the Diet to establish political ethics
  3. Strengthening the ban on donations to ceremonial occasions, etc.
  4. Regulations on business card advertisements, New Year's cards, etc.
  5. Strengthening regulations on posters, etc.
  6. Reducing personnel and office costs
  7. Stock trading regulations
  8. Restraint of parties and new regulations
  9. Concentration of donations to political parties and support for member activities
  10. Expansion of public aid to members of the Diet and examination of political party laws focusing on state subsidies
  11. Fundamental reform of the electoral system
  12. Reduction of total constants
  13. Correcting disparities
  14. Fundamental reform of the electoral district system
  15. Exercising the uniqueness of the House of Councilors
  16. Reform of the current proportional representation system
  17. Reducing the total number of constants and correcting the imbalance in the allocation of constants
  18. Enhancing deliberations and easy-to-understand parliamentary management
  19. Respect for majority rule
  20. Achieving efficient parliamentary management
  21. Determination to remove and eliminate the harmful effects of factions
  22. Transition to a modern national party
  23. Reflections of tribal members
  24. Improving the number of winnings system and ensuring that rewards and punishments are mandatory
  25. New rules for determining candidates
  26. Establishment of decentralization

May 23, 1989 Political Reform Outline

The contents that have been formulated have become a mere mere formality.

Has anything been achieved in this? Looking at the recent party ticket issue, it appears that it has largely faded away, but Prime Minister Kishida recently announced that he is considering disbanding the Kochi-kai. Mr. Nikai's Shijo-kai has announced that it will be disbanded, and the Seiwa-kai, which started it, will also be disbanded. Was it because of the faction itself? In short, it was probably a matter of not reporting political funds. Looking at public opinion to date, it appears that the majority opinion was that the existence of factions themselves was not a problem as a forum for policy discussion, and the prosecutor's investigation also focused on undocumented issues.

Is disbanding factions the solution?

Prime Minister Kishida has said that he will create new party rules while dissolving factions, but first he will create check items from this political reform outline and evaluate each item in stages to see what has been achieved and to what extent. Why not consider it? Instead, they will consider "new rules."

Negative aspects of the parliamentary cabinet system

The negative reason for the creation of factions is related to the structure of the parliamentary cabinet system. Personnel decisions within the party are all about internal party theory, and almost everything is shaped by interpersonal relationships. Your treatment will change depending on which trend you go with. Since the prime minister is the leader of the largest ruling party, the choice of leader is based on internal party theory and is determined by votes from party members based on their factions. On the other hand, if we adopt a dual representation system, no matter how many theories we create within the party, the top positions are decided by the people, so there is little point. It is said that in the United States, which has a presidential system, there are almost no cliques like there are in Japan.

Concept of authority in dual representation system

It is said that one of the reasons why Japan has adopted a parliamentary cabinet system is to limit the authority of the top government. The reason is that they do not have much authority in the sense of reflecting on past wars after defeat. For this reason, Japanese politics takes a very long time to make decisions. In that sense, it can be said that the system is very vulnerable to emergencies. In a dual representation system, the people choose the top person, so the quality of their votes is different from that of other members of the Diet. Furthermore, the number of votes that would be obtained based on the assumption that all citizens would participate in the vote would be vastly different. Members of the Diet are simply elected in the regions in which they run for office. For this reason, the president is given greater authority than the prime minister, who is elected by members of the parliament. This authority also exerts great power in emergencies.